A long-since needed poll.
April 03, 2006 4:33:31 AM UTC Post #21

Neither

April 03, 2006 4:38:56 AM UTC Post #22

ibanez ernie ball fanboi.

April 03, 2006 6:16:31 AM UTC Post #23

QUOTE(Glenn)Neither
But if you had to pick?

April 03, 2006 6:25:42 AM UTC Post #24

QUOTE(Iron--Maiden)QUOTE(Glenn)Neither
But if you had to pick?

Like any sensible man, he would just decline to play that day

April 03, 2006 6:31:22 AM UTC Post #25

QUOTE(Northern_Wrath)QUOTE(Iron--Maiden)QUOTE(Glenn)Neither
But if you had to pick?

Like any sensible man, he would just decline to play that day
I wouldn't mind going straight for the Dean! Well, over a Jackson anyway.

How is Dean wining? :shock:

April 03, 2006 1:09:07 PM UTC Post #26

QUOTE(Iron--Maiden)They are overpriced, they put shitty HZ's in most of the budget range... They play and sound like shit and there are so many better guitars on the market.
only part of that i agree with is the hz pickups and the over priced part. they dont sound shit.. of course there are better guitars but esp are really nice.
i say jackson anywho.

April 03, 2006 1:45:37 PM UTC Post #27

I do actually take that back partially.
ESP LTD sound and play like shit.
ESP can be impressive. But i'd rather not own one.

April 04, 2006 5:10:19 AM UTC Post #28

Neither, the Epiphone rules u all, good sound, relatively light and quite cheap. 8)

April 04, 2006 5:42:44 AM UTC Post #29

Deans just don't do it for me, they play like crap, they sound like crap, they look likecrap.
I've played a dean explosion razorback and it had nothing on the Jackson Kevin Bond Rhoads.

April 04, 2006 12:31:22 PM UTC Post #30

blanemcc wrote:
Neither, the Epiphone rules u all, good sound, relatively light and quite cheap. Cool

*Hits over the head with Epi Les Paul Jr.... What you think i'd actually play that shit?*

QUOTE(Futures)Jackson Kevin Bond Rhoads.
Well compared to that, I would destroy any Dean Very Happy .

Post your comment

You must be logged in to comment

Please sign up for an account or current members login.