|
» Message Boards » Public Trivium Forums » General Discussion » Have you ever thought that trivium changed their style of music in the four records?
|
||
|---|---|---|
|
|
||
| Have you ever thought that trivium changed their style of music in the four records? | ||
Nicola9 |
April 14, 2010 10:09:48 PM UTC | Post #1 |
|
Posts: 21 Member #: 81,435 Joined: 04/14/2010 |
For example, in shogun it sounded more a combiantion of melody with harsh metal. In ascendancy the band only focused on being harsh..whta do you think? |
|
| ^ Top ^ | QUOTE | Reply to Nicola9 | Add Comment | |
The_Blode |
April 14, 2010 11:12:38 PM UTC | Post #1 |
|
Posts: 12 Member #: 80,477 Joined: 04/11/2010 |
=Nicola9 said:For example, in shogun it sounded more a combiantion of melody with harsh metal. In ascendancy the band only focused on being harsh..whta do you think? I think both albums had moments of sheer brutality and then moments of great melody. If any one album was purely focused on creating hard and heavy music, it has to be Ember To Inferno. The entrance into the mainstream probably did have an impact on the band musical direction and style. I think they have continually changed their style of music to keep things interesting for themselves and their fans and I think this is a very good thing. Their discography offers so much diversity that somebody is bound to like at least one of their songs. It's relatively difficult for any band out there to achieve that nowadays. Blode. |
|
| ^ Top ^ | QUOTE | Reply to The_Blode | Add Comment | |
KLOEBguitar |
April 17, 2010 5:12:12 PM UTC | Post #2 |
|
Posts: 1 Member #: 81,921 Joined: 04/17/2010 |
They have, they're first album seemed almost 80's metal influenced. Which was great, then they SLOWLY changed their style. And i emphasize slowly because it wasn't a change over one album. the biggest change was from the first to second album in my opinion. |
|
| ^ Top ^ | QUOTE | Reply to KLOEBguitar | Add Comment | |
Nicola9 |
April 17, 2010 7:49:59 PM UTC | Post #3 |
|
Posts: 21 Member #: 81,435 Joined: 04/14/2010 |
and what do you think od the third album: "The Crusade"? |
|
| ^ Top ^ | QUOTE | Reply to Nicola9 | Add Comment | |
Santana_Annihilate |
April 22, 2010 7:29:44 PM UTC | Post #4 |
|
Posts: 1 Member #: 82,604 Joined: 04/22/2010 |
The Crusade was meh for me
|
|
| ^ Top ^ | QUOTE | Reply to Santana_Annihilate | Add Comment | |
The_Blode |
April 26, 2010 4:19:40 PM UTC | Post #5 |
|
Posts: 12 Member #: 80,477 Joined: 04/11/2010 |
=Nicola9 said:and what do you think od the third album: "The Crusade"? I personally thought it was another solid album from a great band. :-) People were obviously going to scrutinise the record since it was the follow-up to arguably the band's most successful album, "Ascendancy". Yes, the vocals took on a different direction but I personally liked it. All bands tend to do it once or twice in their career. Metallica did it, Avenged Sevenfold did it, Slipknot did it and countless others have. Trivium are always trying to break the boundaries of metalcore and progress further. The new vocals made them more accessible to people and brought in a new wave of fans. If anything, I think The Crusade was more of a financial success than Ascendancy but don't quote me on that. Blode. |
|
| ^ Top ^ | QUOTE | Reply to The_Blode | Add Comment | |
Nicola9 |
April 28, 2010 10:38:26 PM UTC | Post #6 |
|
Posts: 21 Member #: 81,435 Joined: 04/14/2010 |
I , honestly think that "The Crusade" wasnt a good album. First of all, because it wasnt a reflection of the anterior album: "Ascendancy".I understand that we must always improve our skills every day , but changing the vocals very fast.. is not a good option to maintain your bands identity and your fans preference.Second of all, not only the vocals has changed, but also the "way they play their music"(I dont know how to explain it musically, due to my lack of knowledge of guitars blah blah blah blah...)I REALLY believe that the "screaming part" is relevant in a metal band ,since Trivium began its career that way. Now this is my opinion...Im not forcing anyone to believe me , but that is how I thought about the third album. |
|
| ^ Top ^ | QUOTE | Reply to Nicola9 | Add Comment | |
Evil Manny |
May 23, 2010 10:35:17 AM UTC | Post #7 |
|
Location: Wakeley, NSW Posts: 16 Member #: 86,647 Joined: 05/21/2010 |
Crusade is one of my favorites... Actually if I had to place them in order I'd say I can't do it...LOL
|
|
| ^ Top ^ | QUOTE | Reply to Evil Manny | Add Comment | |
The Storm |
May 23, 2010 4:12:46 PM UTC | Post #8 |
|
Location: cape coral, florida Posts: 83 Member #: 52,201 Joined: 11/12/2009 |
=KLOEBguitar said:they're first album seemed almost 80's metal influenced. WHAT? Take your teeth out of me
|
|
| ^ Top ^ | QUOTE | Reply to The Storm | Add Comment | |
Sam Grayson |
June 15, 2010 11:03:16 PM UTC | Post #9 |
|
Posts: 2 Member #: 89,447 Joined: 06/15/2010 |
That's why they are so awesome, because they can play in whaterver way they want |
|
| ^ Top ^ | QUOTE | Reply to Sam Grayson | Add Comment | |
MarkMorton |
July 14, 2010 4:34:07 PM UTC | Post #10 |
|
Posts: 1 Member #: 92,101 Joined: 07/14/2010 |
=Nicola9 said:I , honestly think that "The Crusade" wasnt a good album. First of all, because it wasnt a reflection of the anterior album: "Ascendancy".I understand that we must always improve our skills every day , but changing the vocals very fast.. is not a good option to maintain your bands identity and your fans preference.Second of all, not only the vocals has changed, but also the "way they play their music"(I dont know how to explain it musically, due to my lack of knowledge of guitars blah blah blah blah...)I REALLY believe that the "screaming part" is relevant in a metal band ,since Trivium began its career that way. Now this is my opinion...Im not forcing anyone to believe me , but that is how I thought about the third album. There is vast differences on all 4 albums but regarding your comments on The Crusade i will have to respectfully disgree. Changing the way they sound is a good thing, i don't know about you but i don't wanna hear the same stuff over and over again rendering the band stail, feeling as though if you've heard one song you've heard them all kind of thing. Quite honestly, fuck their anterior album. I don't see why any bands should take that into consideration when creating new music, "they"(any band) as musicians should be able to express whatever is in their heads or theirs hearts without thinking of their fans. Music shouldn't be about that.........ever! The Crusade in my eyes was a very solid release, i beleive it stands up to any other release. Instrumental wise it was phenomanal, add the vocals and it really did feel like a crusade. I've had this conversation with quite a few people and genreally people that share your opinion are usually scene kids that dont know the first thing about music... Eh, not trying to sound like a cunt, i mean no disrespect, its just the way i come across, lol. |
|
| ^ Top ^ | QUOTE | Reply to MarkMorton | Add Comment | |
|
|
||
| Post your comment |
|---|
You must be logged in to comment |

