Thrash Metal
January 16, 2007 3:00:11 PM UTC Post #221

QUOTE(Grimfurg the Mighty @ Jan 16 2007, 08:44 AM) [snapback]340355[/snapback]I wouldn't go that far.
Just my opinion.

January 16, 2007 4:38:55 PM UTC Post #222

QUOTE(Ripper @ Jan 15 2007, 08:19 PM) [snapback]340163[/snapback]Sepultura are generally over rated.
Agreed.

January 16, 2007 9:31:37 PM UTC Post #223

QUOTE(Skotyb @ Jan 16 2007, 04:38 PM) [snapback]340457[/snapback]Agreed.
WHAT AN AMAZING INPUT!!!!!!
I guess its understandable since Linkin Park made one of your favorites albums ever.

January 16, 2007 9:52:03 PM UTC Post #224

Schizophrenia > Pretty much everything Skotyb likes.

January 17, 2007 11:15:15 AM UTC Post #225

Who is that on your sig Gus?
I see who they are, but I can't put my finger on them.

January 17, 2007 2:13:03 PM UTC Post #226

Edge Of Sanity

January 18, 2007 3:09:15 PM UTC Post #227

haha, i wouldn't really consider DevilDriver and King Diamond to be Thrash, just proves how wrong Wikipedia is.

January 19, 2007 5:16:03 PM UTC Post #228

QUOTE(Ripper @ Jan 19 2007, 04:33 PM) [snapback]341601[/snapback]Look it up.

its not not a fact
look that up

January 19, 2007 5:19:48 PM UTC Post #229

It's a fact that bands tend (i.e. are more likely (i.e. more than 50% of the time)) to release better material earlier in their career.

January 19, 2007 5:32:49 PM UTC Post #230

Jesus fucking Christ Rick, you are one dumb ass motherfucker...
It is NOT a fact that bands tend to release better albums earlier in the career because an album being better or worse is an OPINION!!!!!!!!!!
You might think a certain way but someone else might think differently, what makes your opinion a fact and their a ... "fiction"?

Post your comment

You must be logged in to comment

Please sign up for an account or current members login.